\u015eAM – Y\u00fcksek Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Muhammed Cihad El Lahham, say\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, son zamanlarda Halk Meclisi\u2019nin onaylad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Devlet Konseyinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin anayasas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmas\u0131 yasas\u0131na itiraz etti\u011fini ve mahkemenin s\u00f6z konusu maddelerin anayasall\u0131\u011fa ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu karar\u0131na vard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Be\u015far Esad, yak\u0131n zamanda Halk Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan onaylanan Devlet Konseyi yasas\u0131n\u0131, baz\u0131 maddelerinin anayasas\u0131n\u0131 incelemek ve Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun olduklar\u0131ndan emin olmak i\u00e7in Y\u00fcksek Anayasa Mahkemesine havale etmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
El Lahham, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, itiraz edilen birinci f\u0131kran\u0131n, b\u00fcnyesinde sendikal \u00f6rg\u00fctten bir \u00fcyenin \u00fcyeli\u011fini i\u00e7eren devlet konseyinde mesleki mahkemenin kurulmas\u0131yla ilgili oldu\u011funu bu durumun da caiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6yle ki hakim s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n mesleki mahkemede hakim grubundan olmayan sendikal \u00f6rg\u00fctteki bir \u00fcyeye verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bunun anayasal olarak halel te\u015fkil etti\u011fini vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksek Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131, ikinci noktan\u0131n, Dan\u0131\u015ftay Yasas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden birinde, Devlet konseylerinin mahkemeleri \u00f6n\u00fcnde egemenlik iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmedi\u011fine dair bir h\u00fck\u00fcm oldu\u011funu bunun i\u00e7inde de anayasaya ihlal i\u00e7erdi\u011fini, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Anayasan\u0131n 51’inci maddesinin, herhangi bir idari i\u015fin veya karar\u0131n yarg\u0131n\u0131n denetiminden ba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131k hale getirilmesi kanunlar\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fc yasaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti.<\/p>\n
El Lahham, itiraz konusundaki \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc noktan\u0131n, iptal talepleriyle ilgili olarak mahkemeler nezdinde a\u00e7\u0131lan s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ve davay\u0131 doldurma tarihini belirlemekle ilgili oldu\u011funu belirterek, hem kamu g\u00f6revlileri hem de i\u015f\u00e7iler i\u00e7in 60 g\u00fcne ayarlarken geriye kalan vatanda\u015flar i\u00e7in hi\u00e7bir miat belirlenmedi\u011fini bunun da anayasal halel oldu\u011funu \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc vatanda\u015flar\u0131n hak ve vecibelerde kanun \u00f6n\u00fcnde e\u015fit oldu\u011funu, bir gruba miat verip ba\u015fka bir gruba vermemenin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6yle ki, herkesin hak ve vecibelerde e\u015fit olmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in miad\u0131 belirlememizin gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksek Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 El Lahham, mahkemenin anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 buldu\u011fu d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc meselenin, Halk Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan onaylanan Dan\u0131\u015ftay yasas\u0131n\u0131n, Dan\u0131\u015ftay hakimleri aleyhine temyiz davas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ile ilgili oldu\u011funu, bunun da hakimler aras\u0131nda ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun 164. Maddesi, hakimlerin ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n, hakimin aleyhine dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131yan, hakime h\u00fckmedilen usul ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f kurallar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flarda tazminat \u00f6denmesine olanak tan\u0131yan davalar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fini belirtti\u011fini, dava hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve hakimlerin aleyhinde dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131n anayasal bir dengesizlik oldu\u011funu bu y\u00fczden mahkemeni bu noktan\u0131n Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar verdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
El Lahham, mahkemenin bu maddelerin anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fini ve mahkemenin Anayasa ve yasas\u0131na uygun olarak verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00fc\u00e7 yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksek Anayasa Mahkemesi, yasalar\u0131n, yasama kararnamelerinin, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamelerin, liste ve sistemlerin denetlenmesi, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131 ve kararnamelerin anayasas\u0131 ve yasall\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmekle yetkilidir.<\/p>\n